It doesn't take a lot of research to uncover the bad press about theDoug Nash 4+3 manual transmission.
As Richard F. Newton informs us thismonth in "C4 Projects" (page 68), "Chevrolet was working on such a tightdeadline for the Fourth Generation Corvette that there was no time todevelop a new unit specifically for the Corvette." While we're sure GMdid its best when working with such a compressed deadline, reusing partsfor one application that were meant for something else (specifically theCJ-7 and CJ-5 Jeep) can lead to, lets call it, unique driving andmechanical issues.
Originally used in the '84-'88 Corvette, the 4+3 was a fickle beast atbest and required a lot of attention. Either you knew how to keep ithappy or you suffered its anger each time you took your C4 out for ajaunt across town. And as I've been told, keeping it happy wasn't aneasy task--but if you took care of it, and serviced it regularly, the 4+3was your best friend. If not, this wonder of automotive technology couldquickly turn into your worst enemy. Look no further than to Team VETTE'spast staffers for a couple of horror stories.
A $10 part that failed was the cause of one past Associate Editor'stotal transmission loss, while the second owner of our own horror story,"The Zombie," went as far as to replace his 4+3 with an automatic beforeselling it to us.
Like it or hate it, you'll find that replacement options are limited.While those seeking to step away from their current gear grinder have apretty good idea why they want to replace theirs, those in favor of thefour-three might already be questioning the reasons for reading thisarticle. The answer is simple: Qualified professionals with the abilityto properly handle the service or rebuild of your transmission arebecoming increasingly difficult to find.