Due to the EU’s Global Data Protection Regulation, our website is currently unavailable to visitors from most European countries. We apologize for this inconvenience and encourage you to visit www.motortrend.com for the latest on new cars, car reviews and news, concept cars and auto show coverage, awards and much more.MOTORTREND.COM
Subscribe to the Free

Chevy Small Block Part 11 - Pt. 11: Tuner's Delight

F.A.S.T. EFI And A Comp Cams Hydraulic Roller Turn 8.5:1 Compression Into 480+HP

Mike Petralia Aug 1, 2003
Sucp_0308_01_z Chevy_small_block_part_11 Engine 2/14

In our last segment, Danger Mouse (DM) practically blew the roof off when it made more than 600hp on pump gas with help from a "little" Weiand blower. That was super-cool and for a short while we couldn't figure out what to do next that could top that. But after our visit to the COMP Cams/Superflow Advanced Engine Technology Conference in Colorado Springs, Colorado (see: "Power of the Spoken Word," page 90), and hearing Lance Ward from Fuel Air Spark Technology (F.A.S.T.) talk about the power and benefits of EFI, we knew what we had to do next.

EFI Potential
Although it's still relatively expensive, the benefits of EFI far out-weigh its costs. EFI is easier to start and runs better on the street. Its self-tuning capabilities make it adaptable to any situation. Cold mornings, hot summer days, mountain driving, or all-out hauling, EFI can handle them all and will probably save you a few bucks at the pump in the long run too. Today's EFI systems are very easy to install and if you turn a computer on and plug it in, then you can tune EFI.

Sucp_0308_05_z Chevy_small_block_part_11 Horsepower_chart 3/14

As the aftermarket sees the value in EFI and continues to hire and train more computer-savvy tech heads, the average guy on the street will benefit from the true plug-and-play systems being developed. Most of the aftermarket EFI systems from companies like Accel, F.A.S.T., Holley, and others come with ready-made fuel and spark timing tables, also known as "maps", to get any car going once the system is installed. And if you're laptop is plugged in, you can have a buddy tune the car as you drive without ever lifting the hood!

And trust us when we tell you that you do not have to be a computer wiz to tune these things. All it takes is a fair understanding of how an engine burns fuel to make power and you're already about 75% there. Then it's just a matter of learning the operating system's ins and outs, some computer knowledge is helpful here, and you'll be tuning for power. If we can do it, anyone can.

Sucp_0308_06_z Chevy_small_block_part_11 Torque_chart 4/14

Dyno Testing Part 11 Carbureted Power
Since we're always trying to compare our tests to something relevant, we wanted to compare EFI power to a properly tuned carburetor. As it turned out, the carb made almost as much power as the EFI. And it took us a whole day's worth of tuning to get the EFI past the Demon carb at peak power. But look at the extra low-end torque the EFI made in Test 22 (w/ 30-lb/hr injectors at 50 psi) and you'll see one obvious benefit of EFI.

EFI Magic
Tuning an EFI motor is a lot more fun than tuning a carbureted one. The reason is simple; you don't have to lift the hood. Once the system is running, you just need to check the ignition advance with a timing light to make sure it matches the spark setting in the ECU and then close the hood and start driving. In our case, we shut the dyno cell door and started pulling.

Sucp_0308_07_z Chevy_small_block_part_11 Hydraulic_roller 5/14

Comp's new hydraulic roller cam is so secret; this is all we could show. They told us that it would be available soon as part of the new Xtreme Energy EFI line-up, see Test 21 for specs.

Over 75 pulls later, we made the most power using the least amount of fuel (low BSFC number) ever. Sometimes a low BSFC just means you're running on the ragged edge of lean, but we checked the spark plugs very carefully and the dyno's knock sensor never even whispered. Some of this month's extra peak power could also be at least partially attributed to a new proprietary hydraulic roller cam from COMP Cams that we installed. Although it did give up some low-end torque compared to the other cams we've tried, 483 peak horsepower from an 8.5:1 compression, 355-cid small-block is very fierce.

8th Series Of Dyno Tests
Unless listed, no other changes were made for any test.

Danger Mouse specs for Part 11:

355 cid, 8.5:1 cr, 4.030 bore, 3.48 stroke, 5.7-inch rods

Test 21: TFS aluminum heads (Summit Racing PN TFS-30400013-CNC, 72cc chambers, 195cc runners, 2.02/1.60 valves), Edelbrock Victor EFI manifold (PN 29785), Comp Cams Xtreme Energy EFI prototype hydraulic roller camshaft (281/288 adv dur, 230/236 dur at .050, .544/.555 lift w/1.6 rockers, 113 LS) straight up. Comp Cams 1.6:1 Pro Magnum roller rockers, Speed Demon 750 carb, 36 degrees total advance.

Test 22: Installed F.A.S.T. EFI system with Accufab throttle body and 30-lb/hr injectors at 50 psi

Sucp_0308_11_z Chevy_small_block_part_11 EFI_manifold 6/14

Edelbrock made this new EFI manifold based on its popular Victor E-series intake. You can see the corks we plugged into the EFI bosses for the first series of carbureted tests here.

Test 23: Switched to 36-lb/hr injectors at 50 psi.

  Test 21 Test 22 Test 23
2600 352 174 364 180 355 176
2800 350 187 362 193 352 188
3000 357 204 369 211 361 206
3200 379 231 383 233 380 231
3400 389 252 387 251 383 248
3600 385 264 385 264 382 262
3800 385 278 381 276 278 274
4000 384 292 379 289 380 290
4200 387 309 388 310 390 312
4400 406 340 408 342 396 332
4600 424 372 421 369 415 363
4800 428 392 427 391 424 387
5000 429 408 426 405 423 402
5200 430* 426 426 422 419 415
5400 421 433 431* 444 420 432
5600 424 452 423 451 426 455
5800 420 464 420 464 426 470
6000 413 471 420 480* 420 480
Max 430 474 431 480 427 483
Avg 397 330 400 332 396 329
* = peak

We're always looking for new ideas. Do you have a better one for Danger Mouse? Send your test suggestions to:

Super Chevy Magazine
Attn: Danger Mouse
720 Hundley Way
Placentia, CA 92870
Email: mike.petralia@primedia.com

Sucp_0308_15_z Chevy_small_block_part_11 Fuel_regulator 10/14

Fuel pressure was controlled by this return-style SX billet regulator (PN 15404). Also shown is the MSD billet crank-trigger distributor (PN 84697).

BSFC And Proper Injector Sizing
This can get tricky. Fuel injectors are rated by how many pounds of fuel they'd flow wide open in one hour at a given pressure, typically around 43.5 psi. Yet, horsepower output, fuel pressure, the engine's Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC = pounds of fuel consumed per horsepower per hour), and the injector's duty cycle, all determine proper injector size.

Since we know DM worked very efficiently with its Demon carb running in the low-to-mid .400 BSFC area, we wanted to test the EFI in the same range. We figured BSFC would be around .400 and we'd need a minimum injector duty cycle of .85, which means that at max power, the injector will be open 85% of the time. Keep in mind that fuel flow through the injector is affected by fuel pressure, as pressure goes up, volume goes up and as pressure goes down, volume goes down.

We ran most of our tests at 50 psi so the actual amount of fuel flowing through the injectors was higher than its rated figure. You can plug your own figures into this equation to estimate injector size needed for your application. It's safer to estimate a .500 BSFC, not the .400 we used, unless you know your engine can run that efficiently. We used the following formula to estimate injector size for Danger Mouse.

Sucp_0308_16_z Chevy_small_block_part_11 Crank_trigger 11/14

The F.A.S.T ECU can work with any electronic distributor, but you get the most accurate trigger signal and fuel/spark control from a crank-trigger like this MSD PN 8600.

Injector size = (HP x BSFC) / (Number of Injectors x Duty Cycle)
Ex: 480hp engine w/ 8 injectors
BSFC = .400
480 x .400 = 192
8 x 0.85 = 6.4
192 / 6.4 = 30 lb/hr

The math says that with 8 injectors operating at 85% and .400 BSFC, Danger Mouse would need a 30 lb/hr injector. We also tried larger 36 lb/hr injectors at both 43 and 50 psi (Test 23), which made the a little more peak hp, but averages fell off and low-end torque dropped enough to be noticed on the street.

Keep in mind that horsepower estimates in all these calculations are at the flywheel, not the rear wheels. A less efficient engine, (i.e. higher BSFC figure), will need more fuel pressure and bigger injectors.


Westech Performance Group
Mira Loma, CA
Comp Cams
Memphis, TN 38118
SX Performance
St Louis, MO 63143
Russell Performance Products
Daytona Beach, FL 32114
Harv's Performance
Whittier, CA 90606



Connect With Us

Get Latest News and Articles. Newsletter Sign Up

sponsored links

subscribe to the magazine

get digital get print